Court Says Sowore’s Removal As AAC Chairman Right

Justice Inyang Ekwo, the presiding judge, in his ruling, also validated the removal of Mr Malcolm Fabiyi as the deputy national chairman of the party.

The Federal High Court, Abuja on Friday ordered the suspended National Chairman, African Action Congress (AAC), Mr Omoyele Sowore, to stop parading himself as the party national chairman.

Justice Inyang Ekwo, the presiding judge, in his ruling, also validated the removal of Mr Malcolm Fabiyi as the deputy national chairman of the party.

Sowore was the presidential candidate of the AAC in the 2019 Presidential Election.

Sowore, who doubled as AAC’s national chairman, was however suspended alongside Fabiyi, as party’s leaders following allegations against them, while Mr Leonard Nzenwa was appointed the acting national chair.

Nzenwa had approached the court to seek a legal backing on the removal of the former national leaders of the party.

Delivering judgment, Justice Ekwo held that failure of the first and second defendants to give evidence in the suit was prohibitive and fatal in every sense of it.

He held that the defendants were not on ground to depose to their respective counter affidavits in opposition to the plaintiff’s originating summons.

One Joshua Adeoye, who deposed to the affidavits, told the court that the 1st and 2nd defendants had travelled outside the country before the matter was filed, and therefore was unable to depose to the counter affidavits.

However, it was the opinion of the court that the deponent was not a party in the suit, and therefore cannot be deposed an affidavit on behalf of 1st and 2nd defendants who were sues in their personal capacity.

“Evidence of the deponent (Adeoye) goes to nothing and therefore is inadmissible in law,” he said.
According to the judge, the reasons adduced by Adeoye that both defendants travelled abroad ”are not tenable.”

He held the defendants did not take the legal action against them seriously.

In view of the above, Ekwo stated that the defendants did not enter defence in the suit, describing the action as ”unchallenged.”

“Affidavit evidence not challenged or controverted, stands admitted in law and therefore accorded probative value,” he said.

The judge noted that the defendants did not show evidence that the party was against the suit.

“It is the party that has right to seek redress in court. Absolute silence of AAC is an admission of the case of the plaintiff,” he added.

The judge said he was satisfied that the plaintiff was able to discharge the burden of proof in his case.

Consequently, Justice Ekwo granted all the reliefs sought by the plaintiff.

Written by Jacob Akpene

Jacob Akpene is the Editor-in-chief of the Lasgidi Online Brand. He handles the administrative, content creation and the smooth running of the blog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Just in: 10 Nigerians Escape From India Jail

Meghan Markle And Kate Middleton Will Be At Wimbledon To Watch The Women’s Final Today